Skip to main content

In Depth Interview in Phenomenology


During the data collection phase a researcher has to conduct interviews and focus group discussions. In in depth interviews there are certain guidelines that one can follow. These are:
1. As this is an unstructured interview, therefore , no prepared questions are required. First of all this does not mean that a researcher does not have to prepare for the interview; it simply means that there is no structured instrument needed. A structured interview is the one in which one provides the respondents with the choices to mark as his his response. In a semi structured interview, a researcher has open ended questions to as. However, in an unstructured interview niether open ended nor closed ended questions are required. This is because of the fact that one never knows what form an interview is going to take. Neither the researcher nor the respondent knows what result this interaction between them is going to generate.

2. However, instead of preparing interview questions, the researcher can identify themes for interview. A theme actually is a focus; it is an aspect of the issue under consideration that the researcher wants to focus. Thus, interviewing a kidney patient about his disease , if a researcher wants to focus on pain management issues, then this will become his major focus. Moreover, even during the interview one can narrow down this general focus to issues like (borrowing Glaser's Grounded Theory Example Here) resting, medication and pacing. So, a general focus or theme can be further narrowed during the interview.

3. Since, in phenomenology one is more interested in the experiences of a respondent, therefore, it is not enough to know how a respondent judges something; the important thing is to know the experience/or experiences that led him to this judgment.

4. Since, in phenomenology , the focus is not on the world , rather it is one the subject or person who experiences the world, therefore, it is important to know how the respondent experienced the world, or any particular issue or situation. So, for instance if a researcher is interested in knowing how a respondent has experienced the visit to certain park, he should focus on the way this park was experienced by the respondent, and not the specific details of the park. So, a researcher is not particularly interested in how many entrances, swings and canteens were there in the park, but in knowing the way a respondent experienced these objects. And in doing so , he has to take his respondent to a stage where he starts reflecting on his past experience, and tell the researcher about his feelings, expectations, fears thoughts, stimuli selection etc. In short he has to tell how he was conscious of these things.

So, these are a few guidelines for conducting an interview in phenomenological research. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Woah! I'm really enjoying the template/theme of this blog. It's simple, yet effective.

A lot of times it's challenging to get that "perfect balance" between user friendliness and visual appeal. I must say that you've done a great job
with this. Also, the blog loads very quick for me on Chrome.

Exceptional Blog!

Feel free to surf to my webpage: graduate certificate online
F Khalil said…
is there any one who could guide me preparation or framing interview questions in light of my research questions and objectives. I am using IPA

appreciated.

Popular posts from this blog

Shah Hussein: A Great Mystic and Liberal Personality

A Tale of Two Generations: A Story from the Ancient Indus Valley Civilization Imagine the suffocation that can prevail in a religious society and the audacity with which people view any transgression of the moral or religious law.After imagining this suffocation and repression think about a person who has resolved to act against the morality and religious dogmatism and yet has registered himself as a great champion of the people and their faith. Shah Hussain was one such great religious personality who created new values in the society and challenged the older ones. Shah Hussein was a saint who lived during the sixteenth century in the Punjab province. The Punjab is a province which is divided between India and Pakistan and both these countries have parts of this province as their territories. The word Punjab is formed with two words,' Punj' meaning 'five' and 'Aaab' , meaning water. Thus Punjab is the land of five rivers, Ravi, Jhelum, Sutlej, Beas and Chena

Kashmiri Sapphire: A gem of gems

Kashmiri Sapphire: A gem of gems     A Tale of Two Generations: A Story from the Ancient Indus Valley Civilization People already know the story of the unfortunate gem called" Kohinoor" , whose story bears similarities with  that of Helen of Troy, for whom Greeks sailed in thousand ships to sack the city of Troy. Kohinoor so much attracted the British crown that they captured India for it. Indian subcontinent is famous for its rich deposits of precious stones . From the early Vedic periods , gemology has remained a great important art to learn , and there are thousands of years old texts on this subject . Right from the beginning , three stones are ranked as the highest among the gems of the subcontinent; these are Ruby, Sapphire and Emerald. Out of these Ruby being affiliated with the Sun god, is considered as the most precious , and Sapphires come next. Kashmiri Sapphire, in the word of Keats,  is famous for its " sapphire regioned star" of five point

Is it Possible to Remain Unbiased in Research?

A Tale of Two Generations: A Story from the Ancient Indus Valley Civilization According to a famous researcher, it is impossible to conduct an unbiased research. This opinion asserting the impossibility of conducting a perfectly unbiased research appears plausible and correct. This assertion appears to be true because by an unbiased research, researchers usually mean a research that meets the trustworthy criterion, in case they are working in qualitative paradigm. When they work in quantitative paradigm, they consider that research of some quality that meets the requirements of reliability and validity. What are trustworthiness, validity and reliability in the context of research-work? Basically validity means that what a researcher is concluding from the data actually follows from the data; there is some kind of logical connection between the premises, data and the conclusion arrived at on their basis. Moreover, if a researcher generalizes the conclusion and finding of a research